Welcome to AmbedAi – Justice, Reimagined
Explore intelligent legal tools powered by the Constitution and AI
“Justice is not a natural gift; it must be learned and earned.” – B.R. Ambedkar
Overview Stats
Indexed Judgments
1.2M
Appeal Opportunities Identified
245
Judgments Flagged as Inconsistent
18
Real-Time Legal Alerts
7 today
Featured Tools
MindMap Engine
New
Visually explore how judgments, laws, and constitutional articles connect. Drag to navigate, click to expand nodes.
JudgeBot
Live
AI analysis that re-evaluates human judgments based on current law and precedent.
Appeal Potential Scanner
Beta
Find closed or dismissed cases that deserve to be appealed using precedent matching and judgment ranking.
Judgment Verifier
New
Upload or paste judgments for AI-powered integrity checks against precedents and laws.
Constitutional Lens
Live
Analyze legal documents through the lens of constitutional principles and articles.
Legal Trend Tracker
Live
Identify emerging legal trends and patterns across various jurisdictions and case types.
Module Pages (Conceptual Layouts)
MindMap Engine
Search & Filter
Court Level:
SC
HC
Tribunal
Year:
Tags:
Interactive Graph Area (Placeholder)
Node Detail Preview
Judgment: XYZ vs. ABC (2023)
Judgment text snippet: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam...
Cited Cases: Case A, Case B
Outcome: Upheld
View Full JudgmentJudgment Verifier
AI Analysis Flags:
- Contradiction Detected: Paragraph 3.2 contradicts precedent in "Sharma v. State (2021)".
- Outdated Law Referenced: Section 45 of the "Old Act" has been superseded by "New Act, 2022".
- Ambiguous Reasoning: Lack of clear justification for the quantum of damages in Section 5.1.
Judgment Integrity Score: 67%
Recommendation: Consider these 3 supporting judgments instead: "Gupta v. Union (2023)", "Singh v. State (2022)", "Kumar v. Board (2023)".